I remember all the fuss this book made upon it’s release a number of years back. A film documentary was also prepared and showed beautiful cinematography …and even contained fascinating scenes of historic anecdotes – like the visit to an African village where some ancient Chinese porcelain were maintained as important family heirlooms…by a village who had distant Chinese ancestors.

All of this really stimulates cerebral material. So how factual is all of this?
I don’t know, but everyone enjoys some level of connection to some historic footnote. Especially when it relates to our roots. It’s just part of human nature to extract some sort of belonging somewhere and somehow. And frankly, if we all try hard enough, we’d soon discover that we’re all related through some distant ancestor. And everyone likes to believe their ancestors/ people made some sort of important contribution to humanity.
My blog post yesterday “First Nations versus Chinese?“, ushered in a wealth of comments via email to me. I guess not everyone wants to post their thoughts on this blog. In any case, two of the comments posted here, relates to the “1421” work by Gavin Menzies. I felt the comments and observations worthy of a thread post of it’s own. So here in it’s entirety, is a comment by respected Asia Inc. columnist, Mr. Wang Tai Peng:
You may find this study of early Chinese presence in Vancouver island before the Europeans by Gavin Menzies interesting and useful!
• When writing the hardback version of 1421 I thought Zheng He’s ships were composed of Chinese junks with a few Indian ships who joined a Calicut. As time has gone by more and more evidence has shown that substantial numbers of Indian and Korean ships joined the convoy. Recent DNA evidence coupled with finds of Iron implements and weapons has shown that the Japanese contingent was very large indeed.
• DNA shows as that Chou Wen’s fleet on their voyage from North America across the Atlantic contained a Korean division and that his ships had North American Indians abroad – either as passengers or slaves but no Japanese.
• Zhou Man’s fleet on the other hand contained many Japanese ships. Where Chinese DNA is found along Zhou Man’s track, so is Japanese DNA across the Pacific to Australia and New Zealand (as detailed in Talk ‘C’) and North and South America.
• Zheng He’s Fleet were in effect a floating ‘United Nations’. Vasco da Gama was correct all these years ago when he reported that a huge multinational fleet of 800 ships, had preceded him to Calicut on the Malabar Coast of India in ‘about’ 1419.
• Chinese policy was to bring all the world into Confucian harmony. To do this they required to be able to converse with local peoples across the world in their own language.
• Zheng He set up a school for foreign interpreters in Nanjing. By the time of his sixth voyage, interpreters aboard the fleet could converse in 17 languages. One of Emperor Zhu Di’s first orders was to send Zheng He on his first voyage in 1403 to recruit foreign navigators.
• www.1421.tv contains DNA and other evidence of Japanese voyages under the command of Zhou Man to the Atlantic and Pacific coasts of South America, thence across the Pacific to Australia. They left their genetic fingerprints which can be seen in the DNA evidence contained in “The Genetic Legacy of Zheng He’s Fleets”.
• We have recently been informed of DNA results of the original native peoples of Vancouver Island – the Salish people. The principal report on which I rely is that of Professor Mariana Fernandez Cobo in ‘The American Journal of Physical Anthropology’ 2002. She and her colleague’s analysed urine of the Salish Indians, the Navajo; the Guarani of the Amazon and of mainland Japan. The DNA of all four, the entire sequence CAGTTAGA is absolutely identical. This would be a coincidence of 65,536 to one. The Salish, Navajo and Guarani studied in the report can only be Japanese.
• In itself this is of great interest but equally fascinating is the repeated evidence that Japanese ships sailed with Zhou Man. North of Vancouver Island (Salish – Japanese DNA) are the Queen Charlotte Islands whose original inhabitants the Haida have ‘Chinese’ DNA (Professor Bryan Sykes).
• This mirrors what is found in the Amazon. The Guarani have Japanese DNA (Professor Cobo) whilst the tribes living around them the Karitiana and Surui have ‘Chinese’ DNA (Professor Novick and Colleagues). All of these Amazonian peoples have been cut off from the outside world for centuries.
• The Chachi of Ecuador have Japanese DNA (Professor Torroni and colleagues): their neighbours the Paez, Guambiano and Ingano have Chinese DNA (Professor Novick and Colleagues).
• The Navajo have both Japanese (Professor Cobo) and Chinese (Professor Novick) DNA.
• As time goes by doubtless more and more evidence will be found – it will be placed on the website.
And this comment from Muskie, also from the comments posted on yesterdays thread:
If you believe what Gavin Menzie wrote in 1421. Chinese visited Vancouver Island possibly long before Europeans. Of course there is some debate which Europeans really were the first to go some place. Every Canadian knows the vikings sailed to Newfoundland and Nova Scotia before Columbus “discovered” America.
There are claims of pottery techniques being transfered as well as laquer techniques not to mention introducing chickens to indigenous peoples up the Pacific coast.
I think he has pretty strong evidence that China sailed to Africa, whether they rounded the horn I don’t know. I also think there is really compelling evidence that Chinese sailed South, all over South East Asia/ South Pacific and Australia isn’t impossible. But reaching North and South American or Antarctica is a tougher sell.
All you have to do is look at the artwork and faces of the indegenous peoples of Northern Japan and West Coast First Nations, I think the land bridge theory is also valid, but they didn’t have pottery, or smithing, or lacquer techniques back then so shipwrecks and pottery shards are from more modern times.
There is a theory the Chinese or someone sailed to the Caribean before Columbus, as both Columbus and Drake had maps. The book is a bit sensational and you can get all the key points from the television documentry but you might want to look to 1421 for long term examples of Chinese influence and co-operation with indigenous peoples of North and South America.






When I was in China they found a palace that contained statues of the admiral who made the historic journey along with supposedly a big nose foreigner who is suppose to have written the book and/or made the map that helped Europeans discover the new world. This was near Nanjing perhaps, I know this book was a big influence on me visiting Nanjing. Tragically all my pictures were lost as the memory card I bought in Shanghai supposedly was a fake that didn’t last more than a couple weeks, costing me all my carefully taken pictures.
Another book I read while in China was “Guns, Germs, and Steel” it advances the theory that Chinese, Taiwanese really, from the island off the Mainland spread out all over South East Asia and the South Pacific and most everyone is a descendant of this one tribe that was among the first to make seafaring ships, canoes likely. Catamarans with a sail, like those that were used to get to Hawaii.
If you really want to piss off the Japanese and make some Korean friends you can bring up the “Horse Rider Theory” that the Japanese, not the indigenous people from the North who I have no doubt share common ancestors with indigenous people in BC and Alaska, but the real Japanese are actually Koreans and the first Japanese Emperor, the one supposedly descended from the gods is actually a Korean Prince.
On a good day you can see some of the islands that make up Japan from Korea, so someone wouldn’t have been sailing blindly out to sea. The theory really relies on the fact horses are not indigenous to Japan yet feature prominently in Japanese stories, songs, and history. Japanese pre-history has no evidence of horses, so the theory goes that a Korean Prince civilized Japan, and all the aristocrats and ruling families are in fact Korean.
You can see how this theory isn’t popular in Japan.
But when I visited Seoul while I was teaching in Japan I made sure to find this book. These horse riders might have been Manchurians so the Japanese are Chinese or at least have Chinese ancestors. The Japanese definitely owe a lot to Acient China.
“Guns, Germs, and Steel” is more scientific than “1421″ and not as pro-Chinese but it still shows how Chinese if not Han Chinese may have brought civilization or at least certain technologies to all of Asia, including Australia.
I wrote a rather meandering post on this once as I tried to put these theories to test in the game Civilization:
http://blog.muschamp.ca/2006/01/18/guns-germs-steel-koreans-calves-and-civilization-iii/
I’m sure you can turn up better links if you want further information.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Once again it appears my comment is held for moderation…
Like or Dislike:
0
0
As always, Muskie, you leave most interesting comments behind. I don’t think any people arised independently from different respective locations.
It only makes sense that the Japanese people share more in common with their closest neighbour, the Koreans, and them with their closest neighbours, the Chinese.
Like I mentioned, we’re all related somehow and somewhere. But when I see the nonsense we “siblings” inflict upon each other in the name of Nationalism, I think it’s nature’s way of erasing a mistake.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Hey, I like your blog. I am looking for like minded bloggers to start a blog-ring. Check out my blog at http://notawaytolive.blogspot.com/ – its not about Chinese culture or anything like that, its about me and as you can see our blog names kind of match, of course I just found your blog and made up my blogs name a couple of days ago – so don’t think I copy you. Anyway, I will add your link to your blog, I would hope if you can add mine to yours. Also, if you think my blog is too edgy for you, I can take your link off my page – no questions asked. Email me at ****@yahoo.com – Ciao! – John Bogusz
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Holy crap John. That’s some blog you’ve got.
Nothing’s too racy for me …well…uh, we each have our passions, and it’s quite evident what yours is. MILFs? Well, hasn’t quite turned me on yet.
Anyways, good luck with your new blog. Just remember to wash your hands before you hit the keyboard. I’ve also removed your email to avoid spambots.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Wow, I swear you try to blog about something in an intelligent, fair minded, non-offensive way and you still attract attention you probably don’t want. I was so upset the other day I thought about yanking down my entire domain and putting up “FVCK OFF!” in a really big font.
I also wonder about some of the people who leave comments, whether they realize anyone can read them. I’ve gone and edited out people’s email addresses after they have left them in comments in my blog. Besides keeping down on spam, there are other reasons you don’t want your email address publicly available.
http://blog.muschamp.ca/2007/02/27/now-im-a-shiny-new-psycho/
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I can’t recall how I warned you to be careful what you blog about. Even using some words in jest will result in people arriving at your website looking for certain information… It is a classic case of do as I say not as I do, or at least learn from my mistakes.
My life could be substantially better right now if I hadn’t written certain things or had phrased things differently or if people would actually believe me. I don’t understand how some people think and how quick they can be to make judgements, even when they don’t know someone or worse, when you thought they knew you…
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Over on Danwei.org they have a couple maps that have appeared on the internet, they are definitely not from antiquity and I don’t quite get what there point is other to claim that in the distant past, certain people did certain things, long before other people did.
One is about a really old Chinese dynasty, the second is in Japanese and is about early Korean dominance of the world! I read a book about Chinese and Japanese early history and their inter-relation. Kingdoms and city states arose in Korea before Japan and both Korea and China have older written records as a result. The oldest Japanese histories are very nationalistic and contain omissions and fanciful divine origin theories in addition to cataloguing the earliest emperors and important political figures.
Here is the link, it is strange stuff, would help if you can read Chinese and Japanese swell:
http://www.danwei.org/internet/one_better_than_gavin_menzies.php
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Genetic evidence conclusive show that the native Americans have DNA structure identical to Korean DNA. Menzies confused Korean DNA with Chinese DNA in his book,, but Chinese DNA is slightly different from Korean.
Now people are confusing Japanese with Korean. Korean and a majority of the Japanese people share the same DNA structure, but this is only incidental, due to the fact that Koreans settled early Japan. The north Asian people that crossed over to the Americas would have been living in North East Asia, where the Korean people originated. There was no “Japan” when these people migrated. It is probable that the natives of Japan at that time were different from the main line of Japanese today. Arguing that Japanese were included in Jheng He’s fleet on genetic evidence of the native Americans would be like saying that Americans colonized India because some US people share DNA with the British due to their heritage.
If Jheng He sailed using the Korean Kangnido map, and if the DNA of the people of the alleged contact points by Jheng He’s people show distinct Korean DNA, this may actually show that Koreans discovered the Americas. Columbus sailed on Spanish ships, but he was Italian, as were many of his shipmates. If majority of Jheng He’s fleet were Korean, sailed using Korean maps and Korean navigational equipment, this would explain why there is so little documentation on Jheng He’s discoveries in Ming documents and why the expeditions were stopped.
Like or Dislike:
0
1